From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6206 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Pieri Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Rewriting the subject (Was: [sgnus v0.83] Followup Subject: typos in message.el (patch)) Date: 14 May 1996 13:28:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146695 2863 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:44:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:44:55 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA00619 for ; Tue, 14 May 1996 11:02:59 -0700 Original-Received: from unilab.dfci.harvard.edu (unilab.dfci.harvard.edu [155.52.46.57]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 14 May 1996 19:28:46 +0200 Original-Received: (from ratinox@localhost) by unilab.dfci.harvard.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA20321; Tue, 14 May 1996 13:28:15 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-reply-to: Per Abrahamsen's message of 14 May 1996 17:25:07 +0200 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6206 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6206 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>> "PA" == Per Abrahamsen writes: RP> Or a pretty good reason to massage it into something that a human RP> can more easilly parse. PA> Well, that is what nn tried to do with Re^4: and Lotus try to do PA> with the "- Reply" string. Just because something has been done poorly is not reason to not do it right somewhere else. PA> I'd say massage the subject as much as you want for presentation PA> purposes in the article and subject buffers, but when you generate a PA> reply or followup, make the default subject line be in strict PA> compliance with The Seal and with Son-of-RFC1036. You need to be careful, here. For example, is scoring/killing done on the real header contents, or on the massaged version? And if the former, how to make that apparant in the crossover? But otherwise this is quite workable; I am all for it. In fact, much of the code to do this already exists in gnus-simplify-subject-fuzzy and the -regexp variable. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3 Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBMZjCpp6VRH7BJMxHAQEdOgQArBL05NJ8rqnxBCJr0xFe9qWwgRexbdKI uDblRNdUs58yHl0xdWLYCKLzmnIQxaIdbkoNouhE2APLpKSLn4QuSUnET7qtGyRo Y1GbK9PVCwgaecHx1zzBCwjdoJ1LbDQ5vFKZDdhJijnf7M9ZTFDQr7ivtJZjETfu Uwan18Yt1VM= =R8wj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Richard Pieri/Information Services \ If you're not receiving enough attention, \ try knocking over some very expensive http://www.dfci.harvard.edu/ \ antique lamps. -A cat's guide to life