From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6614 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Pieri Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [Gnus 5.2.14] message-make-sender Date: 10 Jun 1996 13:27:27 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035147043 4198 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:50:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:50:43 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA18722 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 10:53:59 -0700 Original-Received: from unilab.dfci.harvard.edu (unilab.dfci.harvard.edu [155.52.46.57]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 19:28:28 +0200 Original-Received: (from ratinox@localhost) by unilab.dfci.harvard.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA11979; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 13:27:55 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: morioka@jaist.ac.jp's message of 11 Jun 1996 01:06:11 +0900 Original-Lines: 55 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.9/XEmacs 19.13 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6614 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6614 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>> "MT" == =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCPGkyLBsoQiAbJEJDTkknGyhC?= / MORIOKA >>>>> Tomohiko writes: MT> Thanks for your kind answer. Please confirm again. MT> In my Emacs, (system-name) returns "is28e1s91", so message.el adds MT> Sender: morioka@is28e1s91 MT> Of course, it is not valid mail address. Actually, it is a valid local mailbox, which is what matters, in this instance. MT> I think Sender field is to identify the agent responsible for MT> sending message, and it seems not enough to identify the agent. 'morioka@is28e1s91' certainly does identify you well enough for anyone on is28e1s91, which is what matters. MT> By the way, (system-name) should return FQDM? That is FQDN, fully qualified domain name. And no, system-name returns the name of the machine you are running on. Not all machines are connected to the Internet, thus not all machines will have a fully qualified domain name. To force system-name to return a meaningless value is... meaningless. Richard> No, that is the Reply-To: header. MT> My from field is valid, so I does have such kind of problem. But what you described is the Reply-To: header, which must be a valid Internet address, and is used when replies are to be directed to someone other than the originator (From:) of a message. MT> My question is MT> Sender: morioka@is28e1s91 MT> is valid or not. According to RFC822, which defines the use of the Sender: header, this is a valid Sender: header. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3 Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBMbxbDJ6VRH7BJMxHAQEeqwQAlzZpTkOdDLSwpsKaPv+uxx221CEgNP3/ J1U7xkJluD9dU+kEtnry4ZQIx1eSz9VY0zfUThKGUf1nDHoY04t8291/Mb6nvXDo 2OAxNNzFSgsafK4psM4NC0jXe5wnf4oy+mgHIBqHTyMPPY6ILh6JZ2WlWgxmGtYs lqjymaoH3Ko= =V5cv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Richard Pieri/Information Services \ Always give generously - a small bird or \ rodent left on the bed tells them, "I http://www.dfci.harvard.edu/ \ care". -A cat's guide to life