From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6631 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Pieri Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [Gnus 5.2.14] message-make-sender Date: 11 Jun 1996 10:09:33 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035147058 4241 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:50:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:50:58 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id HAA01529 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 1996 07:44:42 -0700 Original-Received: from unilab.dfci.harvard.edu (unilab.dfci.harvard.edu [155.52.46.57]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 11 Jun 1996 16:10:23 +0200 Original-Received: (from ratinox@localhost) by unilab.dfci.harvard.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA21554; Tue, 11 Jun 1996 10:09:48 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Sudish Joseph's message of 10 Jun 1996 20:40:10 -0400 Original-Lines: 41 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.14/XEmacs 19.13 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6631 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6631 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>> "SJ" == Sudish Joseph writes: >> [In fact, not only does Sender: not need to contain a valid Internet >> mail address, it generally should not contain one. --Rat] SJ> This is incorrect. If you look at the ABNF above, you'll note that SJ> both "from" and "sender" require the use of a "mailbox" (sure, sender SJ> is optional, but if present it MUST have a "mailbox"). "mailbox" => SJ> "addr-spec" => "domain" (with other stuff, of course). Hrm... yup, you are correct: mailbox = addr-spec = local-part "@" domain so Sender: in Internet (Arpanet) mail must include a valid Internet mailbox when the header is included. [...] >> No, that is the Reply-To: header. SJ> No, the reply-to: address is a user-settable address, just as from: SJ> is Perhaps I misunderstood the description, then. It seemed that the Reply-to: header was being described. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3 Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBMb1+H56VRH7BJMxHAQHPGQQAnX/xSBQU8fx0J6oNX9xEE/Ds4TIJQ2iE 09C7V90/alOmwIYHzBRnETMiptIxk7axaZfz8+yAJtmZh125qSGjm9wu0szRk0Az RvJ6S16jZbYhcx7HbLEL1lyj6R/9YEcoWi1ldF4m7iJSmm+jmoVNOGGnDPcP9OK6 yVvBlZRDRcQ= =/bza -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Richard Pieri/Information Services \ If you're not receiving enough attention, \ try knocking over some very expensive http://www.dfci.harvard.edu/ \ antique lamps. -A cat's guide to life