From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6586
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Mark Eichin <eichin@cygnus.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: various nnml questions, many about cross-posted mail messages
Date: 09 Jun 1996 22:42:41 -0400
Sender: eichin@cygnus.com
Message-ID: <xe17mtgidlq.fsf@maneki-neko.cygnus.com>
References: <199606072316.TAA19343@csb.bu.edu> <x64tolr58d.fsf@eyesore.no>
	<87zq6duw3y.fsf@perv.daft.com> <x6hgsklxm2.fsf@eyesore.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035147021 4123 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:50:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:50:21 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id UAA11330 for <steve@miranova.com>; Sun, 9 Jun 1996 20:14:07 -0700
Original-Received: from cygnus.com (cygnus.com [140.174.1.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <EAA11923@ifi.uio.no> ; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 04:42:52 +0200
Original-Received: from tweedledumb.cygnus.com (tweedledumb.cygnus.com [192.80.44.1]) by cygnus.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA11026; Sun, 9 Jun 1996 19:42:44 -0700
Original-Received: from maneki-neko.cygnus.com by tweedledumb.cygnus.com (4.1/4.7) id AA28887; Sun, 9 Jun 96 22:42:42 EDT
Original-Received: by maneki-neko.cygnus.com; (8.7.5/1.1.8.2/20Sep95-0235PM)
	id WAA02719; Sun, 9 Jun 1996 22:42:42 -0400
Original-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 09 Jun 1996 19:02:13 +0200
Original-Lines: 8
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.10/Emacs 19.31
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6586
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6586

> Well, that's an idea.  I just don't like programs asking.  I like them
> doing.

In the normal case, it will just "do"; the only change is in the case
where now, it beeps at me because the completion doesn't work (which
doesn't count as "doing" :-) I'd like to see this too, it would make
it a lot easier to toss together new folders in response to a
thread...