From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6049 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark Eichin Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: nnml-active-number fails creating new groups (September Gnus v0.79) Date: 25 Apr 1996 20:17:45 -0400 Sender: eichin@cygnus.com Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146563 2364 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:42:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:42:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id RAA06022 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 1996 17:45:11 -0700 Original-Received: from cygnus.com (cygnus.com [140.174.1.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id ; Fri, 26 Apr 1996 02:18:04 +0200 Original-Received: from tweedledumb.cygnus.com (tweedledumb.cygnus.com [192.80.44.1]) by cygnus.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id RAA18879; Thu, 25 Apr 1996 17:17:54 -0700 Original-Received: from maneki-neko.cygnus.com by tweedledumb.cygnus.com (4.1/4.7) id AA17906; Thu, 25 Apr 96 20:17:47 EDT Original-Received: by maneki-neko.cygnus.com; (8.7.5/1.1.8.2/20Sep95-0235PM) id UAA27291; Thu, 25 Apr 1996 20:17:46 -0400 Original-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 24 Apr 1996 04:45:20 +0000 Original-Lines: 42 X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.79/Emacs 19.30 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6049 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6049 I have gotten in the habit of adding new patterns to my nnmail-split-methods list, then respooling (B r nnml RET) into them to create the new groups. That seems to have broken between 0.77 and 0.79; now I get a (void-function-last) if I don't (require 'cl) by hand. If I do the require, I get (wrong-type-argument number-or-marker-p (1 . "1")) in nnmail-active-number. Any suggestions? How should I be creating new nnml:mail groups? ;;; before require'ing cl Signalling: (void-function last) last(((971 . "971") (970 . "970") (969 . "969") (968 . "968") (967 . "967") (966 . "966") (965 . "965") (964 . "964") (963 . "963") (962 . "962") (961 . "961") (960 . "960") (959 . "959") (958 . "958") (957 . "957") (956 . "956") (955 . "955") (954 . "954") (953 . "953") (952 . "952") (951 . "951") (950 . "950") (949 . "949") (948 . "948") (947 . "947") (946 . "946") (945 . "945") (944 . "944") (943 . "943") (942 . "942") (941 . "941") (940 . "940") (939 . "939") (938 . "938") (937 . "937") (936 . "936") (935 . "935") (934 . "934") (933 . "933") (932 . "932") (931 . "931") (930 . "930") (929 . "929") (928 . "928") (927 . "927") (926 . "926") (925 . "925") (924 . "924") (923 . "923") (922 . "922") ...)) nnml-active-number("mail.debian.bugs") nnmail-article-group(nnml-active-number) nnml-save-mail() nnml-request-accept-article(nil "" t) gnus-request-accept-article(nil (nnml "") t) eval((gnus-request-accept-article nil (quote (nnml "")) t)) nnml-request-move-article(70 "mail.personal" "" (gnus-request-accept-article nil (quote (nnml "")) t) t) gnus-request-move-article(70 "nnml:mail.personal" "" (gnus-request-accept-article nil (quote (nnml "")) t) t) gnus-summary-move-article(nil nil (nnml "")) gnus-summary-respool-article(nil (nnml "")) * call-interactively(gnus-summary-respool-article) ;;; after require'ing cl Signalling: (wrong-type-argument number-or-marker-p (1 . "1")) nnml-active-number("mail.debian.bugs") nnmail-article-group(nnml-active-number) nnml-save-mail() nnml-request-accept-article(nil "" t) gnus-request-accept-article(nil (nnml "") t) eval((gnus-request-accept-article nil (quote (nnml "")) t)) nnml-request-move-article(70 "mail.personal" "" (gnus-request-accept-article nil (quote (nnml "")) t) t) gnus-request-move-article(70 "nnml:mail.personal" "" (gnus-request-accept-article nil (quote (nnml "")) t) t) gnus-summary-move-article(nil nil (nnml "")) gnus-summary-respool-article(nil (nnml "")) * call-interactively(gnus-summary-respool-article) If it helps, hitting 'e active RET' gives (971 1 . "1") and that's probably why the 1+ is failing...