From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4819 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: pp@pfawww.pp.se (Per Persson) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: (gnus-inews-domain-name); insertion of Sender: Date: 19 Jan 1996 14:29:02 +0100 Organization: People's Front Against WWW Message-ID: References: <199601181337.OAA28961@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk> <199601190834.JAA01129@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk> <199601191014.LAA01179@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145513 30943 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:25:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:25:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id GAA00820 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 1996 06:16:41 -0800 Original-Received: from sunny.bahnhof.se (pp@sunny.bahnhof.se [193.44.91.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 19 Jan 1996 14:29:26 +0100 Original-Received: (from pp@localhost) by sunny.bahnhof.se (8.7.1/8.7.1) id OAA21478; Fri, 19 Jan 1996 14:29:03 +0100 (MET) Original-To: Per Abrahamsen In-Reply-To: Per Abrahamsen's message of Fri, 19 Jan 1996 11:14:29 +0100 Original-Lines: 9 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4819 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4819 Per Abrahamsen writes: >Cause the software has no choice. So using a half-hearted/intelligent authentication method which might return bogus values is better then letting the user make sure that the value returned is correct? Thanks for clearing things out for me. /pp.