Re: send from queue

[Richard Riley <rileyrg@googlemail.com>]

asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes:

> On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:44:29 +0100, Richard wrote:
>
>> asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes:
>
>>> On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:44:43 +0100, Richard wrote:
>
>>>> No it isnt :  I was asking about sending from the Queue summary. The
>>>> send queue docs refer the reader to Drafts.
>
>>> I got confused by your long explanations I think. Couldn't your entire
>>> article be summed up as "I'd like the D s functionality found in drafts
>>> to work in queue as well"?
>
>> Because its not the same thing.
>
> I am asking you "Couldn't your entire query be summed up as X" and you
> answer "Because its not the same thing". Your answer doesn't parse for
> me.

It couldnt be summed up as X because it wasnt just X. There was the open
confusion about the differences between drafts and queues too. Like a
lot of gnus the power comes, sometimes, at a cost - its not always as
simple as "X" because of overlap-

I explained the basics and then added on the use case. Here:

,----
| I cant find how to send a single message from the queue without
| editing. I'm guessing its there or should be there. I would like all
| outgoing mail to go without a prompt to the message queue, review the
| queue later and send one by one. Sure I can send them all at once using
| JS too from the group buffer.
`----

>
> What you want isn't to have D s do "Send message" in the queue group?

D s doesnt do that as I explained. When I hit "D" it makes the queued
message as backwards read.

>
>> Queue is not drafts : clearly there is some common ground but it isnt
>> clear. A Queue is somewhere you store done messages to be
>> reviewed/sent later.
>
> Sure.
>
>> I wanted to explain the use case.
>
> You just confused me; but that is hopefully just me.
>
>   :-),
>

I think, hope it is, as Robert understood ;)