From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/59766 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Z Maze Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Mark all as read? Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 11:53:48 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1107968418 28627 80.91.229.2 (9 Feb 2005 17:00:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 17:00:18 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M8307@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Feb 09 18:00:18 2005 Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13] ident=mail) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CyvAQ-0004Nq-Kv for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 17:58:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CyvAN-0000Ko-00; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 10:58:15 -0600 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CyvAF-0000Ki-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 10:58:07 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CyvA8-00010l-Dg for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 10:58:00 -0600 Original-Received: from south-station-annex.mit.edu ([18.72.1.2]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CyvA7-0006VP-00 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 17:57:59 +0100 Original-Received: from grand-central-station.mit.edu (GRAND-CENTRAL-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.82]) by south-station-annex.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id j19GvvHT009040 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:57:57 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from outgoing-legacy.mit.edu (OUTGOING-LEGACY.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.104]) by grand-central-station.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id j19GrvaQ001745; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:53:57 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from contents-vnder-pressvre.mit.edu (CONTENTS-VNDER-PRESSVRE.MIT.EDU [18.7.16.67]) ) by outgoing-legacy.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id j19Grndf010002; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:53:49 -0500 (EST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAFVBMVEUGBgS83KhoOivUeFmC pXj4o39qeFZD1JPmAAACOklEQVR4nE2UQY/bIBCFkVPlbpX0bA2tz7sQcl5SlnsWc7cclv// E/oGjNNxokjz8eYxA7HwR9xLKQGRC4eQezqUj7KWnDOzAOB3EjaBKDl4KPARzkvpAIqoUTwI a2op6WVoeXHOlfgsnJPM1kl0SdMIFEJ0AaIJshiRhkCsHbC/51LycKDmgiw2jVJy9B9IDPNN U5NkSMQoR+c5/zTW3qjZgwg5ylpJ2YT4wubO7FEVEs0NhvPJaqzxDaDS2gUpGUjyDkau9NxB fKsmu4Ir2XSpwAjxYwfsfeqlbJwqcAwwcLINxGRWtIhhMEB7ZLoAJudd4aE42e4RCQDjYMXK CpS6XOBtNM7EVfPAbRgihfU08Sg9jqIr9G9JJuo70cCty66gwY6kzJ9xIygyJs7mDNQcSEUV iPSE1qt5mLgUkcGj8ExTbrvii2CwG3UCQkxUXDUPE03KIqPw8Iq33IBfUcbw/Ez9eeo8VvPr qrRNj2RU1DjeaN6cG8c6RKVNnTg+GIDWfAkPBVdK2jC84fCq4n4yik+VNICNtoPlPkScrKmh bPw+FIGSYmBrOUPeNfATjajPpFXtMl0Hvyt4imfzqDvC9zZ3cAEYvlt/ADq7rvDbNKj3RuxC B7gsZRWzbSAaymNXSPxjia8id1GmV6kUyjDMf9vd3daXAiYFd4GvXNzmaT7AspRyJnoif6Nn Ob8UC94fN6KybTSbvB0e46d3Tyzm+I7v4QWW5WGswZulXFNyv/4DGFvqYRv4BxSm28ZwQ4mv AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Face: &OO..E]'&$Q?jm[7H$]lCS"t#FD[|jK.HfvP#![KZ`/,O)lQ(pE<2QS1i~K3+u\{Bh"(4h4G0W#R-F2zZNO6n\!8bk;tu%)f>y{C` P*^7yM`e/x"b1q[?^-9zxTp In-Reply-To: (David Abrahams's message of "Wed, 09 Feb 2005 11:12:27 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (usg-unix-v) X-Spam-Score: -4.9 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42 X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu X-MailScanner-From: ding-owner+m8307@lists.math.uh.edu X-MailScanner-To: ding-account@gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:59766 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:59766 David Abrahams writes: > Can someone please explain the differences between > > 1) `c' in the summary buffer > 2) `Z C' in the summary buffer 'C-h c' and 'C-h Z C' are informative: 'c' marks all unread messages as read, 'Z C' marks all messages (read, unread, ticked, whatever) as read. > 3) `C' in the group buffer > > I really expected 2 and 3 to be equivalent, but #2 actually makes no > change in the number of articles marked unread in the group buffer. I'd kind of expect (2) and (3) to be the same as well. You can also run 'c' from the group buffer, which has the same effect as running it from the summary buffer. I don't think I've ever actually used the capital-C variants. --dzm