From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8532 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans de Graaff Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: New sketch Date: 30 Oct 1996 09:08:28 +0100 Sender: graaff@duticai.twi.tudelft.nl Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.92) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148677 12662 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:17:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:17:57 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 27918 invoked from smtpd); 30 Oct 1996 08:32:59 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 30 Oct 1996 08:32:58 -0000 Original-Received: from duticai.twi.tudelft.nl (duticai.twi.tudelft.nl [130.161.159.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 30 Oct 1996 09:08:38 +0100 Original-Received: from dutifp.twi.tudelft.nl (dutifp [130.161.159.118]) by duticai.twi.tudelft.nl (8.8.2/8.8.2) with ESMTP id JAA28969 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 1996 09:08:36 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: (from graaff@localhost) by dutifp.twi.tudelft.nl (8.8.2/8.8.2) id JAA24459; Wed, 30 Oct 1996 09:08:31 +0100 (MET) Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Face: ,i^c$X{l+r}VV%(bl{^[ writes: > > . > > So -- does it look ok? Or do you prefer the unflipped version? I > dunno myself... The flipped letters do look weird, which is good, but > is it too cliched? A parody is never too cliched. :-) But I think I prefer just having the R's flipped. Hans