From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70045 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Message size too large (where to adjust) Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:13:24 +0200 Organization: Probably a good idea Message-ID: References: <87eiw24ruq.fsf@newsguy.com> <878wmaptz4.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <87eidgiram.fsf@dod.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283170446 8584 80.91.229.12 (30 Aug 2010 12:14:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:14:06 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M18431@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Aug 30 14:14:03 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oq3FK-00048D-W4 for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:13:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Oq3F7-0004bv-1Q; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:13:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Oq3F5-0004bX-Gx for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:13:39 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Oq3F1-0003Bf-Bk for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:13:39 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Oq3F0-0004Yc-00 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:13:34 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oq3Ey-0003vd-3S for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:13:32 +0200 Original-Received: from 62.113.137.5 ([62.113.137.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:13:32 +0200 Original-Received: from sb by 62.113.137.5 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:13:32 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 9 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.113.137.5 Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:91qwPrsaFGXFLqWb5aMdUnGxt/8= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:70045 Archived-At: >>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen : > I can't recall any MTA actually bouncing a mail because of excessive > size the past, er, decade... My ISP did, in their outgoing SMTP server, at least as close as a couple of years ago. (I don't use their outgoing SMTP server anymore, but others might)