From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70876 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: That newfangled IMAP thing... Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:24:50 +0200 Organization: Probably a good idea Message-ID: References: <8762yd6j4j.fsf@rimspace.net> <87eid0fsil.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87bp84y00w.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <878w35ex1q.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87aanlde64.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87sk1dz236.fsf@uwo.ca> <87tylscph8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87pqwgazyi.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284546357 17066 80.91.229.12 (15 Sep 2010 10:25:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 10:25:57 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M19249@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Sep 15 12:25:56 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvpBb-0008VD-47 for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:25:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OvpAu-0002hb-Mp; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 05:25:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OvpAr-0002hK-So for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 05:25:09 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OvpAm-0007Ha-SM for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 05:25:09 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OvpAm-0006Pv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:25:04 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvpAg-00086W-TW for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:24:58 +0200 Original-Received: from 62.113.137.5 ([62.113.137.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:24:58 +0200 Original-Received: from sb by 62.113.137.5 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:24:58 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.113.137.5 Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:r2M8mtU9Q/H4eBCD1cgdYXVlgD0= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:70876 Archived-At: >>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen : > Ted Zlatanov writes: >> If we move sync logic to a central place, we'll be able to reuse it >> for all backends and DTRT in a general way instead of a >> nnimap-specific way. nntp, nnrss, etc. could really use that. > But is it fast? :-) I use gnus-sync.el right now to sync those nntp groups that overlap between my gnusen (such as eg. this one). It's fast once it gets going. The main slowdown for me is the initial setup of tramp ssh (I sync using SSH to a file on a server out in the cloud).