From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70673
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: That newfangled IMAP thing...
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:50:02 +0200
Organization: Probably a good idea
Message-ID: <yb062ygxxn9.fsf@dod.no>
References: <m3r5h9dmqt.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
	<smu4oe4fji8.fsf@linuxpal.mit.edu> <m3mxrw1h7x.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
	<m3aanw1gar.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <m3vd6kz4x5.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
	<m3r5h8z4u7.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <m38w3gz4k3.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
	<m34oe4z3co.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <m3r5h8xnbm.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
	<m3iq2kw2he.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <87hbi25214.fsf@uwo.ca>
	<m3iq2i1ven.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <m3mxrtqvsz.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org>
	<8739tl4dxk.fsf@dod.no> <1svd6gskep.fsf@voll.uninett.no>
	<yb0aansy57a.fsf@dod.no> <1shbi0sgg9.fsf@voll.uninett.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283946634 4220 80.91.229.12 (8 Sep 2010 11:50:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:50:34 +0000 (UTC)
To: ding@gnus.org
Original-X-From: ding-owner+M19046@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Sep 08 13:50:33 2010
Return-path: <ding-owner+M19046@lists.math.uh.edu>
Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org
Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M19046@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1OtJAe-0001VW-Rf
	for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:50:33 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M19046@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1OtJAV-0006ry-BF; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:50:23 -0500
Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33])
	by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <postmaster@quimby.gnus.org>)
	id 1OtJAT-0006ra-Ns
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:50:21 -0500
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51])
	by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <postmaster@quimby.gnus.org>)
	id 1OtJAP-0007jD-N1
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:50:21 -0500
Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1OtJAP-0001il-00
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:50:17 +0200
Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <ding-account@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1OtJAL-0001KC-8Y
	for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:50:13 +0200
Original-Received: from 62.113.137.5 ([62.113.137.5])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <ding@gnus.org>; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:50:13 +0200
Original-Received: from sb by 62.113.137.5 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <ding@gnus.org>; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:50:13 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org
Original-Lines: 17
Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.113.137.5
Mail-Copies-To: never
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VYEc59ZZ79us+oLIjG0OKedj/7w=
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
List-ID: <ding.gnus.org>
Precedence: bulk
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:70673
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70673>

>>>>> Vegard Vesterheim <vegard.vesterheim@uninett.no>:

> Reminds me of another problem with separate folders. I tend to archive
> my replies in the same folder as the original message to keep the
> thread intact.

AOL.

> My regular outgoing email is archived in the "Sent" Folder. Whenever I
> want to search for my own messages, I often find it hard to decide
> which folders to search in.

I use BCC and let the same mail filtering as handles incoming email do
the splitting.  With nnimap groups holding the messages from/to a
mailing list, I let the mailing list send me a copy, and skip the BCC
(because if I get my own messages back from the list, I know that the
list has received it).