From: Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no>
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: Gnus and No Gnus
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:10:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yb08wggvda9.fsf@osl2u223.oslo2.fast.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8763bu59hc.fsf@iki.fi>
>>>>> Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi>:
> On 2009-09-08 11:15 (+0900), Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>> Polls of corporate Emacs users (the last one I've seen was about
>> October 2007) showed that about 1% use Emacs 18, about 10% use Emacs
>> 19 or Lucid 19, about 20% using Emacs 20 or XEmacs 20. I forget what
>> current Emacs was at that time, but by extrapolating I suspect there
>> are indeed a lot of people still using Emacs 21 out there today.
> Yes, Emacs 21 is still used. This is what Debian popularity contest
> graph shows:
> http://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=emacs22-bin-common%2Cemacs23-bin-common%2Cemacs21-bin-common%2Cxemacs21-mule&show_vote=on&want_legend=on&from_date=&to_date=&hlght_date=&date_fmt=%25Y-%25m&beenhere=1
> Debian Sid (the unstable development branch) does not have Emacs 21
> anymore so I guess it will be dropped from next Debian release.
Emacs 21 is the default emacs installed on RHEL4 machines, and there are
quite a few of them around, and they will probably be around for quite a
while.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-15 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-07 12:07 Katsumi Yamaoka
2009-09-07 21:31 ` Glenn Morris
[not found] ` <bnocpmzbka.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
2009-09-08 2:15 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-09-08 4:46 ` Teemu Likonen
2009-09-15 8:10 ` Steinar Bang [this message]
2009-09-08 7:11 ` Glenn Morris
2009-09-15 8:13 ` Steinar Bang
2009-09-15 13:10 ` Ted Zlatanov
2009-09-08 5:15 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2009-09-08 7:19 ` Glenn Morris
2009-09-08 11:13 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2009-09-08 16:49 ` Glenn Morris
2009-09-08 19:08 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-09-09 9:31 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2009-09-15 8:14 ` Steinar Bang
2009-09-15 17:15 ` Reiner Steib
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yb08wggvda9.fsf@osl2u223.oslo2.fast.no \
--to=sb@dod.no \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).