From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70669 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: That newfangled IMAP thing... Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:06:49 +0200 Organization: Probably a good idea Message-ID: References: <87hbi25214.fsf@uwo.ca> <8739tl4dxk.fsf@dod.no> <1svd6gskep.fsf@voll.uninett.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283936841 29606 80.91.229.12 (8 Sep 2010 09:07:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 09:07:21 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M19042@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Sep 08 11:07:19 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OtGcc-000092-Ap for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:07:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OtGcS-00060s-2s; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 04:07:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OtGcQ-00060e-QD for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 04:07:02 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OtGcN-0006aK-Ga for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 04:07:02 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OtGcM-0008CU-00 for ; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:06:58 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OtGcK-0008Rg-Ml for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:06:56 +0200 Original-Received: from 62.113.137.5 ([62.113.137.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:06:56 +0200 Original-Received: from sb by 62.113.137.5 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:06:56 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.113.137.5 Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:VNGQbEO9k52rJtC2r3NrnKVGaQA= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:70669 Archived-At: >>>>> Vegard Vesterheim : > ... I find this concept of presorting email into actual folders > cumbersome, one email message may fit into several different > folders. Imagine being able to just stuff all your email into one > large folder, and then having a good search engine to access this. FWIW opera mail has done this, and google/gmail has done this, and I never got comfortable with either. The presorting I do is split mail for mailing lists. Crossposted emails end up in the first matching rule and gets followups only for that list. I don't try to manually sort email later, but I move/expire mail into archive folders (I back all high-traffic folders with archive folders), and I would have liked search that spans both the folder and its archive folder.