From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/73629 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus search Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:32:42 +0200 Organization: Probably a good idea Message-ID: References: <87vd4n3m0l.fsf@andy.bu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1288182828 8684 80.91.229.12 (27 Oct 2010 12:33:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:33:48 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M21998@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Oct 27 14:33:45 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PB5CK-0004Bp-R1 for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:33:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PB5Bh-0002iz-IK; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:33:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PB5Bd-0002ie-VP for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:33:01 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PB5BY-0003tg-Ae for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:33:01 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1PB5BX-0001Kr-00 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:32:55 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PB5BS-0003eh-Jt for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:32:50 +0200 Original-Received: from 62.113.137.5 ([62.113.137.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:32:50 +0200 Original-Received: from sb by 62.113.137.5 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:32:50 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 28 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.113.137.5 Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:aUXFWerdNMpKFEdaikfCMjqP4/8= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:73629 Archived-At: >>>>> Andrew Cohen : > So---how about changing the behavior in case 2: > 2. If no groups are process-marked search only the group on the current > line (using the appropriate backend). That works for me. (I have an additional feature request for this case: look in the group parameters of the current group for a group parameter giving the name for an archive group and search that as well. My use case is that I keep my high traffic nnimap groups slim by expiring read mail to archive groups, and manually moving ticked messages to the same archive groups). > and possibly adding > 3. If no groups are process-marked and no group is on the current line, > search all opened servers (which might take awhile). The user can put > point on the last line of the group buffer for example. Um... I don't really have any strong views on this one, except... > This last addition might not be a great idea, ...a feeling in this direction, yeah... I only use nnir for imap, and (up until the new nnir) web search for gmane.