From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/81192 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Git support question part XXIV Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:40:03 +0100 Organization: Probably a good idea Message-ID: References: <8762fp4jiq.fsf@gnus.org> <87liol34c0.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328186429 4917 80.91.229.3 (2 Feb 2012 12:40:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 12:40:29 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M29473@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Feb 02 13:40:28 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsvxk-0002GO-L6 for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:40:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsvxe-00057t-Ee; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:40:22 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsvxd-00057m-KD for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:40:21 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsvxc-0000Qs-Ls for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:40:21 -0600 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsvxZ-000860-Rq for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:40:17 +0100 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RsvxZ-0002A5-Lg for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:40:17 +0100 Original-Received: from 62.113.137.5 ([62.113.137.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:40:17 +0100 Original-Received: from sb by 62.113.137.5 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:40:17 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 4 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.113.137.5 Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:AKnbxgb1nj5vwgvtSFoY4BvH0wo= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:81192 Archived-At: The question is then: is the combined diff format meaningful at all? Wouldn't it have been more meaningful to diff against the previous commit on master?