From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/71374 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: More IMAP testing, please Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:35:32 +0200 Organization: Probably a good idea Message-ID: References: <87ocbsuu51.fsf@andy.bu.edu> <87iq20ymof.fsf@rimspace.net> <87mxrb313t.fsf@rimspace.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285141013 2391 80.91.229.12 (22 Sep 2010 07:36:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 07:36:53 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M19747@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Sep 22 09:36:51 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyJsk-00061v-ME for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:36:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OyJrn-0008Tp-QD; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 02:35:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OyJrl-0008Tb-GB for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 02:35:45 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OyJrg-0008JA-EC for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 02:35:45 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OyJrf-0002nw-00 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:35:39 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyJrf-0005Tt-HV for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:35:39 +0200 Original-Received: from 62.113.137.5 ([62.113.137.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:35:39 +0200 Original-Received: from sb by 62.113.137.5 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:35:39 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.113.137.5 Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:MRq8CA89wQQls7bagwJ/lKx61rY= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:71374 Archived-At: >>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen : > For servers that have the UIDPLUS capability, `B DEL' should (and does, > I think?) first mark the message as deleted, and then expunge the > message in question. > If the server doesn't have UIDPLUS, the only way to make messages go > totally away is to do an EXPUNGE on the mailbox. That will make all > messages that are marked as \Deleted disappear forever. Hm... it sounds like to be safe I should to pull dovecot 1.2.x from debian backports, rather than wait for a new stable ("squeeze") to pull it in for me...? (For new readers: the current debian stable ("lenny") has dovecot version 1.0.15, which does not support UIDPLUS. That support came, in 2008 or thereabouts, with version 1.1, back )