From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/69389
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Anyone ever used gnus-change-server?
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:50:13 +0100
Organization: Probably a good idea
Message-ID: <yb0pr4mky3u.fsf@osl2u223.oslo2.fast.no>
References: <yb0tytylfyl.fsf@osl2u223.oslo2.fast.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1265219540 18663 80.91.229.12 (3 Feb 2010 17:52:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 17:52:20 +0000 (UTC)
To: ding@gnus.org
Original-X-From: ding-owner+M17792@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Feb 03 18:52:18 2010
Return-path: <ding-owner+M17792@lists.math.uh.edu>
Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org
Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M17792@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1NcjOg-0005OP-La
	for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:52:14 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M17792@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1NcjNK-0002XX-Kt; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:50:50 -0600
Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32])
	by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <postmaster@quimby.gnus.org>)
	id 1NcjNI-0002Wu-5u
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:50:48 -0600
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51])
	by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <postmaster@quimby.gnus.org>)
	id 1NcjNE-0005AN-HD
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:50:45 -0600
Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1NcjN5-0001kL-00
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:50:35 +0100
Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <ding-account@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1NcjN5-0003zY-Ly
	for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:50:35 +0100
Original-Received: from 62.113.137.5 ([62.113.137.5])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <ding@gnus.org>; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:50:35 +0100
Original-Received: from sb by 62.113.137.5 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <ding@gnus.org>; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:50:35 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org
Original-Lines: 10
Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.113.137.5
Mail-Copies-To: never
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FeWJbm1cB0SC2Zo3KoYUj22j9Ms=
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
List-ID: <ding.gnus.org>
Precedence: bulk
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:69389
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/69389>

>>>>> Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no>:

> However, this time I just had 5 groups to switch, and a reasonably
> fast machine to run Gnus on (a P4), so I thought it may be worth it.

> But this morning the P4 machine had been using 100% CPU on this
> overnight, and still hadn't completed.

Still running at 100% CPU.  I think I'll C-g gnus-change-server and
reclaim the process.