From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/69005 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus and No Gnus Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:14:48 +0200 Organization: Probably a good idea Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1253002827 7732 80.91.229.12 (15 Sep 2009 08:20:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 15 10:20:20 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MnTGs-00076b-7W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:20:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40326 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MnTGr-0003BN-FX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:20:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MnTGk-00038T-Rl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:20:10 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MnTGf-00032t-8b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:20:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49464 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MnTGf-00032e-4x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:20:05 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:39153) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MnTGe-00042X-Pd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:20:05 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1MnTGc-00072x-Su for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:20:02 +0200 Original-Received: from 217.144.235.5 ([217.144.235.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:20:02 +0200 Original-Received: from sb by 217.144.235.5 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:20:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 9 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.144.235.5 Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:eLyiQTHctpphz44n40+e3BBvOiU= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:115342 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:69005 Archived-At: >>>>> Katsumi Yamaoka : > Basically I'm positive to drop old Emacsen. It seems enough to > support the latest major version and one predecessor. Those who use > Emacs 21 may perhaps not want to work on upgrading Gnus. But in > another thought, we don't have so much difficulty in supporting Emacs > 21 for the present. Therefore I think it's not time to drop Emacs 21. I'm glad to hear it.