From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/23942 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: pahe@daimi.au.dk (Peter von der =?iso-8859-1?q?Ah=E9?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: some mail annoyances Date: 07 Jul 1999 02:34:59 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035161582 5947 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:53:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:53:02 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA18015 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 20:39:09 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAB22051; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 19:35:38 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 06 Jul 1999 19:36:13 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA00800 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 19:36:04 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from ufleku.daimi.au.dk (root@ufleku.daimi.au.dk [130.225.19.182]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA17919 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 20:35:02 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from pahe@localhost) by ufleku.daimi.au.dk (8.9.3/8.8.4) id CAA12940; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 02:34:59 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Ahe In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "04 Jul 1999 04:19:04 +0200" Original-Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070089 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.89) Emacs/20.3 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:23942 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:23942 >>>>> "LMI" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: LMI> Gnus, by default, handles all its group using the same approach. LMI> This approach is very newsreaderly--you enter a group, see the LMI> new/unread messages, and when you read the messages, they get marked as LMI> read, and you don't see them any more. (Unless you explicitly ask for LMI> them.) I remember that "explicitly asking for them" was a problem for me when I first started using Gnus. I think a note about C-u SPC in the group buffer or C-u C-x C-s in the summary buffer would be nice. Cheers, Peter