From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/5576 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: gsstark@MIT.EDU (Greg Stark) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: performance respooling articles in nnmbox or nnbabyl Date: 18 Mar 1996 12:40:26 -0500 Organization: Massachvsetts Institvte of Technology Sender: gsstark@MIT.EDU Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146159 740 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:35:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:35:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA10219 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 1996 10:14:14 -0800 Original-Received: from lola-granola.MIT.EDU (LOLA-GRANOLA.MIT.EDU [18.70.0.26]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id ; Mon, 18 Mar 1996 18:40:37 +0100 Original-Received: (from gsstark@localhost) by lola-granola.MIT.EDU (8.7.4/8.6.11) id MAA05431; Mon, 18 Mar 1996 12:40:35 -0500 (EST) Original-To: larsi@ifi.uio.no (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen) In-Reply-To: larsi@ifi.uio.no's message of 18 Mar 1996 17:18:35 +0100 Original-Lines: 21 X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.51/Emacs 19.30 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5576 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5576 >>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > gsstark@mit.edu (Greg Stark) writes: >> What i really want to happen is for the split-method functions to be >> reapplied, and if the result doesn't match the existing Xref header, only >> then should the article be moved. > Hm. It seems perfectly valid to me to respool articles to the same group, > really. This is handy if one wants to "clean up" the article numbers, for > instance. I agree, that's why i think there are two different operations being considered here. There are times when losing existing information and treating marked articles as completely new articles is intended; but when i add a new split method i want a little effect as possible, so i don't want the unaffected articles moved, and i don't want information about the moved articles lost. greg