From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4836 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: gsstark@MIT.EDU (Greg Stark) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Sparse threads Date: 20 Jan 1996 09:09:33 -0500 Organization: Massachvsetts Institvte of Technology Sender: gsstark@fierce-bad-rabbit.MIT.EDU Message-ID: References: <68emvqh8.fsf@bjob.no> <199601101841.TAA11446@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145528 31012 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:25:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA11158 for ; Sat, 20 Jan 1996 11:42:45 -0800 Original-Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.69.0.28]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sat, 20 Jan 1996 15:09:38 +0100 Original-Received: from FIERCE-BAD-RABBIT.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP id AA01476; Sat, 20 Jan 96 09:09:26 EST Original-Received: by fierce-bad-rabbit.MIT.EDU (5.57/4.7) id AA25193; Sat, 20 Jan 96 09:09:36 -0500 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: larsi@ifi.uio.no's message of 20 Jan 1996 06:25:06 +0100 Original-Lines: 15 X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.29/Emacs 19.30 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4836 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4836 >>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Uhm. I don't think Gnus should go check the archive group; that would take > too long. However, you will be able to select these sparse nodes That sounds pretty cool. Would this be more feasible if the archive method were a method that had an overview file? What advantages does nnfolder have? greg