From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/11034 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Greg Stark Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: looking for references headers for the ^ command Date: 22 May 1997 18:22:26 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150811 27891 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:53:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from sandy.calag.com (root@sandy [206.190.83.128]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA25506 for ; Thu, 22 May 1997 16:16:14 -0700 Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by sandy.calag.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA26957 for ; Thu, 22 May 1997 16:15:52 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA06110 for ; Thu, 22 May 1997 18:15:10 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 23 May 1997 00:22:58 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 12377 invoked by uid 504); 22 May 1997 22:22:56 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 12374 invoked from network); 22 May 1997 22:22:55 -0000 Original-Received: from g61-148.citenet.net (brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu@207.183.45.148) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 22 May 1997 22:22:54 -0000 Original-Received: by g61-148.citenet.net id m0wUgFx-0008eZC (Debian Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #2); Thu, 22 May 1997 18:22:45 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Justin Sheehy's message of 21 May 1997 21:01:03 -0400 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.52/Emacs 19.34 Original-Lines: 20 Original-Xref: altair.xemacs.org dgnus-list:1422 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11034 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11034 Justin Sheehy writes: > This would defeat the entire purpose of NOV, which is to make it > unnecessary to read the entire articles. > > If the NOV data is not going to be sufficient, then don't bother > providing it at all. You misunderstand, i've looked at it now, the current logic is to use the NOV data except when it's the current article in which case Gnus looks for the actual fields. Going back to the original source makes sense for most situations in which the NOV data is actually generated based on real references headers. What i'm asking for is for Gnus to fall back on the NOV data if it exists and the real headers don't work. i've looked at the source and it should be small change and it won't affect normal cases where the actual headers are valid. greg