From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/5348 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: gsstark@MIT.EDU (Greg Stark) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Selected articles, replying vs. enter-digest-group'ing Date: 28 Feb 1996 02:57:15 -0500 Organization: Massachvsetts Institvte of Technology Sender: gsstark@fierce-bad-rabbit.MIT.EDU Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145964 32515 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:32:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:32:44 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id AAA23201 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 00:29:34 -0800 Original-Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.69.0.28]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 08:57:21 +0100 Original-Received: from FIERCE-BAD-RABBIT.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP id AA25961; Wed, 28 Feb 96 02:56:46 EST Original-Received: by fierce-bad-rabbit.MIT.EDU (5.57/4.7) id AA26885; Wed, 28 Feb 96 02:57:19 -0500 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: larsi@ifi.uio.no's message of 28 Feb 1996 07:59:52 +0100 Original-Lines: 8 X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.39/Emacs 19.30 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5348 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5348 It would be really cool if enter-digest-group respected the process mark. This would involve adding features to nndoc, but would be great with those multi-part FAQs and digests like Risks that have threads that span multiple digests. greg