From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/17003 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jean-Yves Perrier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: 'nndoc' view of a multipart msg problem? Date: 12 Sep 1998 14:58:20 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035155781 31096 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:16:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:16:21 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA03006 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 1998 09:01:52 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAF16820; Sat, 12 Sep 1998 07:32:54 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 12 Sep 1998 08:00:22 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA28826 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 1998 08:00:10 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from nagpcy.nagra-kudelski.ch (nagpcy.nagra-kudelski.ch [193.246.109.164]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA02968 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 1998 09:00:03 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from [10.0.50.51] by nagpcy.nagra-kudelski.ch (NTMail 3.02.13) with ESMTP id za044979 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 1998 14:59:52 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 30 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070028 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.28) Emacs/20.3 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:17003 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:17003 Hello, I've just received a multipart messages (multipart/mixed) with 3 parts: 1) text/plain 2) text/html 3) message/rfc822 The author of the multipart message is A. The author of the embedded message/rfc822 is B. I saw this when doing C-d: [ 96: A ] <* mixed> [ 1: A ] <1 text> [ 7: A ] <2 html> [ 71: A ] <3 rfc822> <- note the A Shouldn't this be displayed as: [ 96: A ] <* mixed> [ 1: A ] <1 text> [ 7: A ] <2 html> [ 71: B ] <3 rfc822> <-note the B ? Best regards, -- Jean-Yves