From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/16710 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jean-Yves Perrier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Pterodactyl Gnus v0.15 is released Date: 05 Sep 1998 10:41:58 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035155538 29443 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:12:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:12:18 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA02124 for ; Sat, 5 Sep 1998 04:44:18 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAF14070; Sat, 5 Sep 1998 03:15:22 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 05 Sep 1998 03:44:02 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA06266 for ; Sat, 5 Sep 1998 03:43:47 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from nagpcy.nagra-kudelski.ch (nagpcy.nagra-kudelski.ch [193.246.109.164]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA02118 for ; Sat, 5 Sep 1998 04:43:31 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from [10.0.50.51] by nagpcy.nagra-kudelski.ch (NTMail 3.02.13) with ESMTP id wa042246 for ; Sat, 5 Sep 1998 10:43:24 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "05 Sep 1998 01:47:19 +0200" Original-Lines: 16 X-Mailer: Pterodactyl Gnus v0.15/Emacs 20.3 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:16710 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:16710 Mhmm, the output has a lot more \201 than Gnus 0.14 :-( First thing I notice is, when I send a message with יאיאאי in the subject, these are sent as 8 bits. (and then displayed as \201י... in my *Summary buffer*) Shouldn't they be sent using ?iso-8859-1?Q?... syntax? If the body may be 8bits encoded, I didn't understood that the headers could be too... Hope it helps, -- Jean-Yves Perrier