From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/15080
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kim-Minh Kaplan <KimMinh.Kaplan@utopia.eunet.fr>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Regenerating nnml group?
Date: 25 Apr 1998 12:01:17 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <yg4vhryfceq.fsf@lombric.s-ip.eunet.fr>
References: <tbiuo3mfmj.fsf@blue.sea.net> <vaf1zurnszh.fsf@ramses.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <tb4sznma3y.fsf@blue.sea.net> <x7ra2rgl99.fsf@chow.mat.jhu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI MIME-Edit 0.91 - "Hinomiko")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035154173 20031 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:49:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:49:33 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from gwyn.tux.org (gwyn.tux.org [207.96.122.8])
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA26116
	for <steve@altair.xemacs.org>; Sat, 25 Apr 1998 09:13:08 -0700
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (root@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by gwyn.tux.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA18114
	for <steve@xemacs.org>; Sat, 25 Apr 1998 12:14:47 -0400
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAH16008; Sat, 25 Apr 1998 08:38:21 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 25 Apr 1998 08:37:25 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA15957 for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Sat, 25 Apr 1998 08:37:15 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: (qmail 11031 invoked by uid 504); 25 Apr 1998 13:36:59 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 11028 invoked from network); 25 Apr 1998 13:36:57 -0000
Original-Received: from lombric.s-ip.eunet.fr (193.107.197.179)
  by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 1998 13:36:55 -0000
Original-Received: (from kaplan@localhost)
	by lombric.s-ip.eunet.fr (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA02329;
	Sat, 25 Apr 1998 12:01:18 +0200
Original-To: Ding mailing list <ding@gnus.org>
In-Reply-To: Dan Christensen's message of "Tue, 21 Apr 1998 13:03:30 -0400"
Original-Lines: 12
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.4/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald"
X-Emacs: 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs  Lucid without mule
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:15080
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:15080

Dan Christensen writes:

> Question:  could Gnus handle bad references more gracefully?  Silently
> omitting articles from the summary buffer is bad.  

I believe it soon will.  This problem was recently reported by Hrvoje
Niksic and I sent a patch that seems to correct this (Hrvoje was not
definitive on wether this indeed solved the problem or not).  If you
want to give it a try (please do and report success/failure) the patch
is in message <yg47m5fu9xw.fsf@lombric.s-ip.eunet.fr>.

Kim-Minh.