From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/28031 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: dave-mlist@bfnet.com Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nnslashdot groups hang emacs! Date: 09 Dec 1999 16:18:15 -0500 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <5bd7sfpw94.fsf@giga.cs.rochester.edu> <199912100014.QAA27590@newman.aventail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035164949 27663 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:49:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:49:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Shenghuo ZHU , ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: from bart.math.uh.edu (bart.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.48]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA23172 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 1999 19:18:29 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by bart.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAB26103; Thu, 9 Dec 1999 18:18:22 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 09 Dec 1999 18:18:34 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA01110 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 1999 18:18:24 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from knave.rad.directint.net (adsl-63-195-122-207.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.195.122.207]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA23165 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 1999 19:18:00 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (qmail 1757 invoked by uid 2001); 9 Dec 1999 21:18:15 -0000 Original-To: wmperry@aventail.com In-Reply-To: wmperry@aventail.com's message of "Thu, 9 Dec 1999 16:14:54 -0800" Original-Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070099 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.99) Emacs/20.4 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:28031 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:28031 >> Is there any way to break out of it without killing emacs? BP> Well, it is usually in a spin of (while ... (accept-process-output process BP> 1)), and if that is not interruptible, it is a bug in emacs. This should BP> be less of a problem since everything in the new package is asynch by BP> default and doesn't do silly things like those asynch loops. What do you mean by "everything in the new package?" What new package? Dave