From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36392
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lloyd Zusman <ljz@asfast.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Has `mm-inline-image-xemacs' changed recently?
Date: 25 May 2001 00:53:17 -0400
Organization: FreeBSD/Linux Hippopotamus Preserve
Sender: Lloyd Zusman <ljz@asfast.com>
Message-ID: <ygeitiqhvwi.fsf@asfast.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171984 8349 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:46:24 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:46:24 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@gnus.org>
Original-Received: (qmail 3642 invoked by alias); 25 May 2001 04:53:28 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 3637 invoked from network); 25 May 2001 04:53:27 -0000
Original-Received: from home.ljz.net (root@216.27.138.217)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 25 May 2001 04:53:27 -0000
Original-Received: (from hippo@localhost)
	by home.ljz.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA03310;
	Fri, 25 May 2001 00:53:18 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: home.ljz.net: hippo set sender to ljz@asfast.com using -f
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Face: "!ga1s|?LNLE3MeeeEYs(%LIl9q[xV9!<nimJxd1qyQRquvu5XTnZ:_5VE-G&4*EAuW"7oJLIXj'DWrJ0z@,FlwvD2PA@qhQ2R#zgsc14Klk;OSE'*;+l8p?0^nK7*X#0zg5wd^!M^2pg,M4Qd^{1viG;fa{}b.s[?g(x$45c]]=@'ZQ&]sPXl!u:hxBAv>j4#xf4!**BFW_ihlOb;:Slb>)vy>CJM<qjGM,/6C6\|{))YWm6}Q#?3om%n8
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.4 (Academic Rigor)
Original-Lines: 20
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36392
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36392

I'm using the latest (as of May 25) CVS version of Gnus under
XEmacs-21.4.3.

Has the function `mm-inline-image-xemacs' in `mm-view.el' changed
within the past few days, or maybe the past week?  I don't have any
earlier version of Gnus handy to check this myself, and I'm pretty
rusty with CVS.

I think that the problem that I was reporting about inline images
always appearing at the end of of the article buffer is due to the way
that this function is written.  If this `mm-inline-image-emacs' was
indeed changed recently, I'd like to see if the older version of this
function might have been doing something different that would have
allowed proper image placement.

Thanks in advance.

-- 
 Lloyd Zusman
 ljz@asfast.com