From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/42064 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Russ Allbery Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Benchmarking Gnus Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 20:42:38 -0800 Organization: The Eyrie Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035177360 9411 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 05:16:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 05:16:00 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 21893 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2002 04:43:16 -0000 Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu (mail@129.7.128.13) by mastaler.com with SMTP; 16 Jan 2002 04:43:16 -0000 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 16Qhue-0004oC-00; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 22:43:00 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 15 Jan 2002 22:42:53 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id WAA26759 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 22:42:43 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 21882 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2002 04:42:44 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 21877 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2002 04:42:44 -0000 Original-Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (171.64.13.23) by gnus.org with SMTP; 16 Jan 2002 04:42:44 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 8157 invoked by uid 50); 16 Jan 2002 04:42:38 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 16 Jan 2002 03:12:37 +0100") Original-Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090005 (Oort Gnus v0.05) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp, sparc-sun-solaris2.6) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:42064 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:42064 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Inspired by the recent discussion on news.software.readers, I've been > benchmarking group entry a bit. I've used ELP, and it led me to find > some weaknesses in the manner format specs are used. (The pre-compiled > functions were supposed to be used for default values, but they > weren't.) After fixing that, and inlining some other functions, I got > group entry of a 1K group down from 2 seconds to 1.5 seconds. (Yes, > this is a new and spiffy machine. :-) Any luck on the speed problems when pressing "g"? I'm not sure there's any other good profiling data that I can provide.... -- Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)