From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/32520 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Russ Allbery Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Odd followup problem (XEmacs 21.1.12, Gnus 5.8.7) Date: 20 Sep 2000 21:45:11 -0700 Organization: The Eyrie Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035168793 20295 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:53:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:53:13 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 421D7D051F for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 00:49:23 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAC01078; Wed, 20 Sep 2000 23:45:49 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 20 Sep 2000 23:44:57 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA26671 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2000 23:44:49 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.64.13.23]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 66BBBD051F for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 00:45:14 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (qmail 24003 invoked by uid 50); 21 Sep 2000 04:45:12 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32520 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32520 I just upgraded to XEmacs 21.1.12 and Gnus 5.8.7 (from XEmacs 21.1.7 and Gnus 5.8.2), and also went from a non-MULE XEmacs to a MULE XEmacs if it makes any difference. I'm now getting an odd occasional problem when I follow up to news articles. I get the error: Mail header "220 81296 ..." doesn't conform to RFC 822. skipping... and a beep before getting the message editing buffer, and if I check the " *Original Article*" buffer, the headers of the article have what looks like the server return from the ARTICLE command on the first line (the 220 response code, the article number, and the message ID). It only seems to do this for the first few times and then stops, until I restart XEmacs. Everything seems to work fine, so it's just an annoyance rather than a serious problem. Does this ring a bell with anyone? -- Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)