From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/27247 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Russ Allbery Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Broken References (was: Cups) Date: 25 Nov 1999 12:23:56 -0800 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <86903n762l.fsf@megalith.bp.aventail.com> <9t9wvr6fnub.fsf@mraz.iskon.hr> <9t93dtufi47.fsf@mraz.iskon.hr> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035164306 23580 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:38:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:38:26 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA29146 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 15:24:52 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAC14870; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 14:24:43 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 25 Nov 1999 14:24:37 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA00983 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 14:24:27 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.64.12.23]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA29138 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 15:24:02 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (qmail 26375 invoked by uid 50); 25 Nov 1999 20:23:56 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Hrvoje Niksic's message of "25 Nov 1999 21:09:44 +0100" Original-Lines: 9 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.66/Emacs 19.34 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:27247 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:27247 Hrvoje Niksic writes: > Except that wrapping doesn't preclude shortening. When speaking of > header size limits, folded headers count as one line. Or doesn't it? Not according to the standards, and not in INN I'm fairly sure. -- Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)