From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/19270 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Russ Allbery Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: "-- " for signatures? Date: 27 Nov 1998 12:14:08 -0800 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157650 10747 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:47:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:47:30 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA06314 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 15:15:33 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAB13470; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 14:14:44 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 27 Nov 1998 14:14:32 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA04024 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 14:14:25 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.64.12.23]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA06305 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 15:14:17 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (qmail 11853 invoked by uid 50); 27 Nov 1998 20:14:08 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Stainless Steel Rat's message of "27 Nov 1998 14:18:17 -0500" Original-Lines: 14 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.66/Emacs 19.34 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:19270 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:19270 Stainless Steel Rat writes: > "KG" == Kai Grossjohann writes: > KG> Where was it again where it is specified that signatures should be > KG> separated from the rest of the message by a "-- " line? > One of the Internet RFCs specifies it... but I cannot for the life of me > remember which one. Are you sure it's an RFC? I thought the only "official" reference was in Son-of-1036. -- Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)