From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/32769 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Russ Allbery Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Starting a second Gnus -- dangerous? Date: 04 Oct 2000 15:17:35 -0700 Organization: The Eyrie Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035168994 21595 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:56:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:56:34 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6618D0524 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 18:18:21 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAC03050; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 17:18:02 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 04 Oct 2000 17:17:21 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA07749 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 17:17:11 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.64.13.23]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E85F8D0524 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 18:17:36 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (qmail 11625 invoked by uid 50); 4 Oct 2000 22:17:35 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "04 Oct 2000 20:42:29 +0200" Original-Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32769 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32769 Kai Gro=DFjohann writes: > On 04 Oct 2000, Chris Shenton wrote: >> And if it detects the other, remote session and exits, how does one >> then get to use Gnus? How can you safely terminate the remote running >> Gnus session? > I hope that auto-save takes care of that. It should... It does. I kill running Gnus emacs processes all the time and it copes fine. --=20 Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)