From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/23250 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Russ Allbery Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Pterodactyl Gnus v0.85 is released Date: 13 Jun 1999 09:25:43 -0700 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87r9nh3qlm.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035161018 997 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:43:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:43:38 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA21531 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 1999 12:30:03 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAB19263; Sun, 13 Jun 1999 11:26:32 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 13 Jun 1999 11:26:57 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA26714 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 1999 11:26:49 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.64.12.23]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA21368 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 1999 12:25:52 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (qmail 26599 invoked by uid 50); 13 Jun 1999 16:25:43 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: amu@MIT.EDU's message of "13 Jun 1999 00:42:09 -0400" Original-Lines: 15 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.66/Emacs 19.34 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:23250 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:23250 Aaron M Ucko writes: > OK, that's much more reasonable; I'd still prefer xv, but won't object > to either display or xloadimage (which I suspect is a bit more common, > though I don't have accounts enough places to verify that claim by > myself :-)) display cooperates better with older virtual window managers and produces *massively* better picture quality on my Creator 3D Sun machine (to the point where I can barely stand to use xv). display is also *very* actively developed, whereas xv seems to be mostly dead unless I'm just not looking in the right places. -- Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)