Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: forwarding as text rather than MIME?
Date: 25 Feb 1999 02:39:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ylpv6yoji2.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Per Abrahamsen's message of "23 Feb 1999 19:32:21 +0100"

Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk> writes:
> Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:

>> It didn't use MIME.  MIME is frowned upon in most news hierarchies.
>> Toni summed it up pretty well.

> *Unreadable* MIME is frowned upon.  I don't think message/rfc822 is
> particularily unreadable.

Not that this is most hierarchies, but as for one particular fairly small
hierarchy, <URL:http://www.usenet2.org/rules.txt> says:

| No binaries: "Usenet is Text"
| -----------------------------
| 
| This isn't 1985. There are plenty of ways to exchange images and
| software without hiding them in text.
| 
| No subhierarchy can allow posts of binaries. If necessary, a separate
| "bin.*" hierarchy will be created for this purpose.
| 
| HTML and other verbose rich text formats are binaries. The only allowed
| MIME types are: none (in which case the message must be in ISO8859.1,
| since there must be a default and that's one that'll cover most of the
| likely traffic), or:
| 
|         MIME-Version: 1.0
|         Content-Type: text/plain; charset=<any>  OR  multipart/signed
|         Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit  OR  7bit
| 
| If the Content-type is multipart/signed, then the parts may be:
| 
|         Content-Type: text/plain
|         Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

At the time we wrote this, there was full justification for being this
strict (and some similar policies are reflected in Cleannews filters and
other similar places).  Nowadays, I think it would probably be worth
letting up on that to a large degree, but in the meantime I know there are
lots of other moderated groups and smaller hierarchies that have set up
similar policies.  A way to revert to the old forwarding method is really
necessary for those places for at least a little longer.

Remember, MIME implementations have sucked so hard to date that everyone's
still in shell shock from them and there are a lot of engrained reflex
reactions.  It's going to take a year or two of available non-sucking MIME
implementations before this will change.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)         <URL:http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


  parent reply	other threads:[~1999-02-25 10:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-02-15 18:20 Bill White
1999-02-15 20:36 ` Hans de Graaff
1999-02-19 14:23   ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1999-02-20  9:44     ` Hans de Graaff
1999-02-21  7:21       ` Chris Tessone
1999-02-21 10:38         ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1999-02-21 19:37           ` Chris Tessone
1999-02-21 19:40             ` Hrvoje Niksic
1999-02-22 12:54               ` Toni Drabik
1999-02-22 17:43                 ` Hrvoje Niksic
1999-02-22 17:58                   ` Robert Bihlmeyer
1999-02-22 18:26                     ` Hrvoje Niksic
1999-02-23 18:32                       ` Per Abrahamsen
1999-02-24 15:52                         ` Robert Bihlmeyer
1999-02-24 16:17                           ` Hrvoje Niksic
1999-02-24 16:30                             ` Chris Tessone
1999-02-24 16:43                               ` Alexandre Oliva
1999-02-24 16:52                                 ` Chris Tessone
1999-02-24 17:01                                 ` Kai.Grossjohann
1999-02-24 17:10                               ` Robert Bihlmeyer
     [not found]                           ` <m3678rtieo.fsf@serpent.laymusic.>
1999-02-25 17:17                             ` Kai.Grossjohann
1999-02-25 10:39                         ` Russ Allbery [this message]
1999-02-26  7:14                   ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1999-02-26 11:48                     ` Hrvoje Niksic
1999-02-26 12:30                       ` Per Abrahamsen
1999-02-26 14:45                       ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1999-02-27 12:38                         ` Russ Allbery
1999-02-27 13:15                           ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1999-02-27 14:13                           ` Hrvoje Niksic
1999-02-28 19:21                           ` Per Abrahamsen
1999-02-22 22:13               ` Aaron M. Ucko
1999-04-03  7:28       ` Hans de Graaff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ylpv6yoji2.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu \
    --to=rra@stanford.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).