From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: highlighting and fontification
Date: 05 Oct 1999 15:49:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ylso3pjudb.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Hrvoje Niksic's message of "05 Oct 1999 16:13:22 +0200"
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1204 bytes --]
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:
> François Pinard <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>> Let's take the simultaneous left-right justification. It has been
>> demonstrated that for fixed width fonts, it hurts legibility and
>> decreases reading speed.
> Does somebody have more info about this? I've heard the claim that
> justification decreased legibility of texts written in fixed-width fonts
> many time, but I've never seen an explanation on why that is so, or a
> reference to research.
Left-right justification, when done with word choice and careful attention
to line length, should be as legible as normal ragged-right text. Perhaps
slightly more legible because it's aesthetically pleasing; that's a matter
of personal taste. When it is done by inserting more white space into the
text, however, it disrupts the normal flow of inter-word spacing, which is
highly distracting for the reader's eye. We're used to inter-word spacing
being uniform throughout the text; extra spacing stands out, causes longer
pauses in reading, and sets off as specially significant breaks which have
no special meaning.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) <URL:http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-10-05 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-09-09 17:51 Daniel Monjar
1999-09-09 21:55 ` Jack Vinson
1999-09-09 22:34 ` Karl Kleinpaste
1999-09-10 15:35 ` Stainless Steel Rat
1999-09-10 16:24 ` Kai Großjohann
1999-09-10 16:32 ` Emerick Rogul
1999-09-10 18:29 ` Stainless Steel Rat
1999-09-10 19:01 ` Kai Großjohann
1999-09-12 5:16 ` Stainless Steel Rat
1999-09-13 9:17 ` Michael Piotrowski
1999-09-13 18:32 ` Florian Weimer
1999-09-13 21:46 ` Mick Gower
1999-09-15 22:13 ` Edward J. Sabol
1999-09-19 2:56 ` Greg Stark
1999-09-25 0:47 ` Ken McGlothlen
1999-10-05 1:40 ` François Pinard
1999-10-05 14:13 ` Hrvoje Niksic
1999-10-05 22:49 ` Russ Allbery [this message]
1999-10-06 0:45 ` David Coe
1999-09-14 12:33 ` Toby Speight
1999-09-14 8:24 ` Tibor Simko
1999-09-11 1:44 ` Rene H. Larsen
1999-09-11 7:06 ` Graham Murray
1999-09-12 5:05 ` Stainless Steel Rat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ylso3pjudb.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu \
--to=rra@stanford.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).