Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: highlighting and fontification
Date: 05 Oct 1999 15:49:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ylso3pjudb.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Hrvoje Niksic's message of "05 Oct 1999 16:13:22 +0200"

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1204 bytes --]

Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:
> François Pinard <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>> Let's take the simultaneous left-right justification.  It has been
>> demonstrated that for fixed width fonts, it hurts legibility and
>> decreases reading speed.

> Does somebody have more info about this?  I've heard the claim that
> justification decreased legibility of texts written in fixed-width fonts
> many time, but I've never seen an explanation on why that is so, or a
> reference to research.

Left-right justification, when done with word choice and careful attention
to line length, should be as legible as normal ragged-right text.  Perhaps
slightly more legible because it's aesthetically pleasing; that's a matter
of personal taste.  When it is done by inserting more white space into the
text, however, it disrupts the normal flow of inter-word spacing, which is
highly distracting for the reader's eye.  We're used to inter-word spacing
being uniform throughout the text; extra spacing stands out, causes longer
pauses in reading, and sets off as specially significant breaks which have
no special meaning.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)         <URL:http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


  reply	other threads:[~1999-10-05 22:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-09-09 17:51 Daniel Monjar
1999-09-09 21:55 ` Jack Vinson
1999-09-09 22:34 ` Karl Kleinpaste
1999-09-10 15:35   ` Stainless Steel Rat
1999-09-10 16:24     ` Kai Großjohann
1999-09-10 16:32       ` Emerick Rogul
1999-09-10 18:29       ` Stainless Steel Rat
1999-09-10 19:01         ` Kai Großjohann
1999-09-12  5:16           ` Stainless Steel Rat
1999-09-13  9:17             ` Michael Piotrowski
1999-09-13 18:32             ` Florian Weimer
1999-09-13 21:46               ` Mick Gower
1999-09-15 22:13                 ` Edward J. Sabol
1999-09-19  2:56                   ` Greg Stark
1999-09-25  0:47                   ` Ken McGlothlen
1999-10-05  1:40                   ` François Pinard
1999-10-05 14:13                     ` Hrvoje Niksic
1999-10-05 22:49                       ` Russ Allbery [this message]
1999-10-06  0:45                         ` David Coe
1999-09-14 12:33               ` Toby Speight
1999-09-14  8:24             ` Tibor Simko
1999-09-11  1:44         ` Rene H. Larsen
1999-09-11  7:06           ` Graham Murray
1999-09-12  5:05             ` Stainless Steel Rat

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ylso3pjudb.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu \
    --to=rra@stanford.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).