From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/24964 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Russ Allbery Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Articles always unread? Date: 31 Aug 1999 04:42:16 -0700 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035162437 11572 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:07:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:07:17 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA29255 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 1999 07:43:05 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id GAB12593; Tue, 31 Aug 1999 06:43:03 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 31 Aug 1999 06:43:19 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA28748 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 1999 06:43:09 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.64.12.23]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA29243 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 1999 07:42:23 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (qmail 2400 invoked by uid 50); 31 Aug 1999 11:42:16 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Jochen Lillich's message of "31 Aug 1999 11:47:55 +0200" Original-Lines: 11 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.66/Emacs 19.34 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:24964 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:24964 Jochen Lillich writes: > is there a feature (like a group parameter) that lets me define mail > groups whose articles always stay unread, even if already read? The standard answer to this question is that you probably want to tick messages to obtain this behavior. What are you trying to accomplish, in general terms, and why isn't ticking the messages working correctly? -- Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)