From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/42743 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Russ Allbery Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Was I dreaming...? Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 18:38:39 -0800 Organization: The Eyrie Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <873d0qz2l2.fsf@bang.priv.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035177942 13607 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 05:25:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 05:25:42 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 15032 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2002 02:39:45 -0000 Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu (mail@129.7.128.13) by mastaler.com with SMTP; 29 Jan 2002 02:39:45 -0000 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 16VOAn-0000sW-00; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 20:39:01 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 28 Jan 2002 20:38:57 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id UAA13612 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 20:38:46 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 15002 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2002 02:38:45 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 14997 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2002 02:38:45 -0000 Original-Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (171.64.13.23) by gnus.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 2002 02:38:45 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 17872 invoked by uid 50); 29 Jan 2002 02:38:39 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Harry Putnam's message of "Mon, 28 Jan 2002 17:47:14 -0800") Original-Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090005 (Oort Gnus v0.05) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp, sparc-sun-solaris2.6) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:42743 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:42743 Harry Putnam writes: > But really, it seems there just isn't any really handy way to tell if > enough changes have happened to warrent an cvs up. I guess I was > looking for a command like cvs -? That would return something like: cvs -n update will tell you what would be updated without actually doing it. That will at least tell you how many files have changed, although it won't tell you by how much each file has changed. -- Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)