gnus-summary-limit-to-unread should document its antidote

gnus-summary-limit-to-unread should document its antidote

[jidanni]

x runs the command gnus-summary-limit-to-unread.
Its docstring should mention its antidote.
Also mention it on (info "(gnus)Limiting").

It turns out its antidote is probably.
/ o runs the command gnus-summary-insert-old-articles

You see, after the user uses x, he gropes in the dark for a way to
counteract what he just did, short of quitting the group and entering
it again.

Re: gnus-summary-limit-to-unread should document its antidote

[Reiner Steib]

On Sun, Jul 20 2008, jidanni@jidanni.org wrote:

> x runs the command gnus-summary-limit-to-unread.
> Its docstring should mention its antidote.

I don't think there's an exact antidote for `x'.  `/ o' surely isn't it.

Bye, Reiner.
-- 
       ,,,
      (o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo---  |  PGP key available  |  http://rsteib.home.pages.de/

Re: gnus-summary-limit-to-unread should document its antidote

[Dave Goldberg]

>>>>> On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:07:28 +0200, Reiner Steib <reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc> /U7=m^"/-Dn61mAl{g9e3>\G5Tp,oEX|V)g2I1hBk\ML;)7A?6cmB-y7y?'NA^J<=oz7syB =(McAwIHgLX!.B?R3X}98d@?>CrT094KLWh]WU4gDpnL/")MS(XoQTv`Oq225uL>+;CpPXo$N5e>N> $tPd-gbB^F{gQS#1ase]XO~D4p4M"3+F-7~u]dy3I?Pb8RO*H-EFeWDUf?Rf,d]pv\Jvh2Cht!A=im yKAS2Z%Ao^;}W/qzMvMm said:

> On Sun, Jul 20 2008, jidanni@jidanni.org wrote:
>> x runs the command gnus-summary-limit-to-unread.
>> Its docstring should mention its antidote.

> I don't think there's an exact antidote for `x'.  `/ o' surely isn't it.

What about `/ w'?  gnus-summary-pop-limit.

-- 
Dave Goldberg
david.goldberg6@verizon.net

Re: gnus-summary-limit-to-unread should document its antidote

[Johan Bockgård]

Reiner Steib <reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc> writes:

> On Sun, Jul 20 2008, jidanni@jidanni.org wrote:
>
>> x runs the command gnus-summary-limit-to-unread.
>> Its docstring should mention its antidote.
>
> I don't think there's an exact antidote for `x'.  `/ o' surely isn't it.

How about `/ w'?

-- 
Johan Bockgård

Re: gnus-summary-limit-to-unread should document its antidote

[Reiner Steib]

On Mon, Jul 21 2008, Dave Goldberg wrote:

>>>>>> On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:07:28 +0200, Reiner Steib <reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc> /U7=m^"/-Dn61mAl{g9e3>\G5Tp,oEX|V)g2I1hBk\ML;)7A?6cmB-y7y?'NA^J<=oz7syB =(McAwIHgLX!.B?R3X}98d@?>CrT094KLWh]WU4gDpnL/")MS(XoQTv`Oq225uL>+;CpPXo$N5e>N> $tPd-gbB^F{gQS#1ase]XO~D4p4M"3+F-7~u]dy3I?Pb8RO*H-EFeWDUf?Rf,d]pv\Jvh2Cht!A=im yKAS2Z%Ao^;}W/qzMvMm said:

Oops, that's my X-Face in your attribution line.

>> I don't think there's an exact antidote for `x'.  `/ o' surely isn't it.
>
> What about `/ w'?  gnus-summary-pop-limit.

Ah, I forgot about this.  You and Johan are right.

I don't think it make sense to mention `/ w' in all limiting doc
strings.

Bye, Reiner.
-- 
       ,,,
      (o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo---  |  PGP key available  |  http://rsteib.home.pages.de/