Re: [PATCH] Building in a cleaner environment for XEmacs.

[Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org>]

>>>>> In <microsoft-free.87k7dtva79.fsf@eicq.dnsalias.org>
>>>>>	Steve Youngs <youngs@xemacs.org> wrote:

KY> Is the lpath.el file useless for that purpose?

SY> >From what I could see, lpath.el is more for hiding/ignoring warnings
SY> and errors.  I didn't want to do that, I wanted to address all the
SY> warnings properly if possible.

I feel those effects are the same, except that it is good to
indicate the sources of the hidden features using autoload.
I probably need to try ``xemacs -batch -no-autoloads...'' by
myself. :)

SY> BTW, what do I need to do to prevent screwing up the ChangeLog again?

I'm using binary (C-u C-x C-f FILENAME RET binary RET) and the
following hook function for those files since I have no need to
edit Latin names. :-p

(setq revert-buffer-insert-file-contents-function
      ;; written by IKEYAMA Tomonori -san in the xemacs-users-ja list.
      (lambda (file-name auto-save-p)
	(if (not (file-exists-p file-name))
	    (error "File %s no longer exists!" file-name))
	(let ((buffer-file-name nil))
	  (or auto-save-p
	      (unlock-buffer)))
	(widen)
	(let ((coding-system-for-read buffer-file-coding-system))
	  (insert-file-contents file-name (not auto-save-p) nil nil t))))
-- 
Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org>