From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/75318
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Riley <rileyrg@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: splitting docs
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:56:49 +0100
Organization: aich tea tea pea dicky riley dot net
Message-ID: <ypfwtse3a6.fsf@news.eternal-september.org>
References: <vyr5dd3jog.fsf@news.eternal-september.org>
	<m3sjxscqh0.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1292867838 12719 80.91.229.12 (20 Dec 2010 17:57:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:57:18 +0000 (UTC)
To: ding@gnus.org
Original-X-From: ding-owner+M23669@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Dec 20 18:57:10 2010
Return-path: <ding-owner+M23669@lists.math.uh.edu>
Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org
Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M23669@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1PUjyu-0001Wg-0d
	for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:57:08 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M23669@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1PUjym-0001TI-5C; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:57:00 -0600
Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33])
	by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <rileyrg@googlemail.com>)
	id 1PUjyk-0001Sz-Mm
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:56:58 -0600
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51])
	by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <rileyrg@googlemail.com>)
	id 1PUjyg-0005pu-4f
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:56:58 -0600
Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.214.45])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <rileyrg@googlemail.com>)
	id 1PUjyf-0005m9-9L
	for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:56:53 +0100
Original-Received: by bwz16 with SMTP id 16so3966691bwz.32
        for <ding@gnus.org>; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:56:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:organization
         :references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version
         :content-type;
        bh=a4ekeSm5Ys5ieBRB15Rw+uHrUsiAziRfxYmcy19HRWs=;
        b=gOXfQsD/b3efDi3lnLfUt/lp90rTUeqNdqAyhhwuRFTbaejFZBclYJM+IRay8WjNob
         qdjbC9ZB8vw9IpaxzQoBJYg+/DuxJ7eKh82wZoJ66nkCmEK5KP63V4bGHMXrRmfgFGGc
         8X3BzAXAiVytF99qfP6Xx0jK7pKWEfLmcogLc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=from:to:subject:organization:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id
         :user-agent:mime-version:content-type;
        b=s2A1DzW381+Yk/NQ6Bbotspb+UGrZwqLZ81mzC0AC3OrdEMVuFPE6izn+XY/rg00l8
         ea6rzNpxR2yiojUvosm6W8WdEslukQmseXspkqYm04qK3qx68iusjDB3ulPKBv9NPmWR
         XROanJ8i7RRNTNjtppabQ7fxQmZxm9cS47oX4=
Original-Received: by 10.204.117.77 with SMTP id p13mr2401969bkq.19.1292867812616;
        Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:56:52 -0800 (PST)
Original-Received: from localhost ([85.183.18.158])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v25sm3730082bkt.6.2010.12.20.09.56.50
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:56:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <m3sjxscqh0.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's
	message of "Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:18:51 +0100")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---)
List-ID: <ding.gnus.org>
Precedence: bulk
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:75318
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/75318>

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> Richard Riley <rileyrg@googlemail.com> writes:
>
>> I believe, but am not sure, that nnimap-split-inbox is now obsolete and
>> replaced with nnimap-inbox??
>
> Yes.
>
>> But while you're reading
>>
>>  ;(setq nnimap-split-fancy '(| (: spam-split) "INBOX"))
>>  ;(setq nnimap-split-methods 'nnimap-split-fancy)
>>
>>  ;(setq nnmail-split-fancy '("SYS-INBOX"))
>>  ;(setq nnmail-split-methods 'nnmail-split-fancy)
>
> If
>
> (| (stuff ...) "INBOX")
>
> is a valid split, then
>
> (| "INBOX")
>
> is, too, as well as
>
> "INBOX"

(setq nnimap-split-fancy '(| (: spam-split) "INBOX"))
(setq nnimap-split-methods 'nnimap-split-fancy)

So whats wrong with the above?

Should it work?

If you say it *should* work, I'll post the backtrace.