From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36577 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mats Lidell Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Imap Problem Date: 05 Jun 2001 10:34:47 +0200 Sender: matlid@spip.netinsight.se Message-ID: References: <76y9rdaxai.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com> <76zobsxrkj.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com> <76n17o9q1k.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172138 9286 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:48:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:48:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Simon Josefsson , ding@gnus.org, Mats Lidell Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 13895 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2001 08:35:18 -0000 Original-Received: from gw.contactor.se (HELO pm1.contactor.se) (193.15.23.130) by gnus.org with SMTP; 5 Jun 2001 08:35:18 -0000 Original-Received: from spip.netinsight.se.contactor.se (pm1 [193.15.23.1]) by pm1.contactor.se (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA11752; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:34:48 +0200 (MET DST) Original-To: Jake Colman In-Reply-To: <76n17o9q1k.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Academic Rigor) Original-Lines: 21 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36577 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36577 >>>>> Jake wrote: Jake> I went back to my prior version of pgnus, prior to Simon's Jake> commits, and manually applied on my Matt's one line change to Jake> imap.el. With this patch applied, I cannot start gnus in its Jake> own frame. if I do, the password prompting is messed up and it Jake> eats my CR instead of processing the password. So this problem Jake> is specifically related to Matt's portion of the patch and was Jake> not caused by whatever else Simon patched. OOPS! Quite right. I use .authinfo and with no prompt during startup I thus didn't get this problem. With no .authinfo I see this problem too. (at least on NT.) Back to the drawing board!? Could someone please explain how setting the buffer when looking for the imap response could possibly affect how passwords are read from the minibuffer? Yours -- %% Mats