From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/82158
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: poirier <poirier@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: nnmaildir vs offlineimap: patch to use flags properly
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 08:53:17 -0400
Message-ID: <yua8vd3rv42.fsf@kabuki.localhost>
References: <m2wr0pyzui.fsf@gmail.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1345900396 5374 80.91.229.3 (25 Aug 2012 13:13:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 13:13:16 +0000 (UTC)
To: ding@gnus.org
Original-X-From: ding-owner+M30426@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Aug 25 15:13:16 2012
Return-path: <ding-owner+M30426@lists.math.uh.edu>
Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org
Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M30426@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1T5GAt-0007uq-Dw
	for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 15:13:15 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M30426@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1T5G9Q-0002mS-Ui; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 08:11:45 -0500
Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33])
	by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <ding-account@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1T5Frq-0002hX-G9
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 07:53:34 -0500
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51])
	by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <ding-account@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1T5Fro-0005If-Q6
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 07:53:33 -0500
Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <ding-account@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1T5Frm-0000gC-V0
	for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 14:53:30 +0200
Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <ding-account@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1T5Frl-0004ER-28
	for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 14:53:29 +0200
Original-Received: from user-0ce2hol.cable.mindspring.com ([24.225.71.21])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <ding@gnus.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 14:53:29 +0200
Original-Received: from poirier by user-0ce2hol.cable.mindspring.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <ding@gnus.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 14:53:29 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
Original-Lines: 15
Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: user-0ce2hol.cable.mindspring.com
User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.1 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:SVZPBKepewCh0YXWsEbOPYIol4g=
X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--)
List-ID: <ding.gnus.org>
Precedence: bulk
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:82158
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/82158>

On Thu. 2012-08-23 at 07:04 PM EDT, Magnus Henoch <magnus.henoch@gmail.com> wrote:

> Last week I posted a patch for nnmaildir to make it use maildir
> filename-based flags, in order for it to play nicely with offlineimap
> WRT marking messages as read/unread.
>
> Here it is:
>
> http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8055#41
>
> But it seems like nobody saw it, so I'm making some noise here.  What do
> you think about the patch?

I can't speak to the implementation, but I'd be very happy to see gnus
interoperate compatibly with other maildir clients that flags.