From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8988 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sudish Joseph Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Danger! Danger! Date: 26 Nov 1996 15:02:59 -0500 Sender: sj@atreides.mindspring.com Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.84) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149081 15761 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:24:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:24:41 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 9866 invoked from smtpd); 26 Nov 1996 20:22:49 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 26 Nov 1996 20:22:48 -0000 Original-Received: from atreides.mindspring.com (qmailr@atreides.mindspring.com [204.180.142.236]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 26 Nov 1996 21:03:00 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 7332 invoked by uid 52477); 26 Nov 1996 20:02:59 -0000 Original-To: The Ding List In-Reply-To: David Moore's message of 26 Nov 1996 11:18:43 -0800 Original-Lines: 30 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.70/XEmacs 19.15 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8988 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8988 In article , David Moore writes: > Steven L Baur writes: >> Ouch. I'm noticing a different effect. I'm having some messages that >> are counted as unread in the *Group* buffer disappear into the ether. > I used to notice this occasionally, and thought it was related > to crossposts or duplication or NoCeM. But in 0.70 it's happening _a > lot_. Also now sometimes when I enter a group, read all of the articles > and exit, the group buffer will say '1' instead of '0', but when I go > into it, nothing's there of course. I've been seeing this since 0.60. It didn't happen prior to 0.56. In private mail with Lars, I convinced myself that Gnus was getting confused when the head article was cancelled. I'm no longer sure of this. I just had a 7 article group present 5 articles on entering. Also, it'd be real neat if M-RET behaved like C-u SPC. I.e., it should not look at ticked/dormant article numbers. Just fetching the last n articles and presenting them w/o *any* further processing would be _extremely_ useful. As things stand, port 119 is the only way we have of checking stuff; too time-consuming to be a real option for me. BTW, the gnus-emphasise stuff simply rewlz. Makes a huge difference when reading and is easy to create when writing. No hope of ever making this standard, but it'd have been a really nifty, lightweight mechanism that works on all UA's. -Sudish