From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/11197 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sudish Joseph Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nndraft (was: Re: nnagent) Date: 29 May 1997 22:35:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150948 28891 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:55:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:55:48 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from sandy.calag.com (root@sandy [206.190.83.128]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA22832 for ; Thu, 29 May 1997 20:27:08 -0700 Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by sandy.calag.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA06815 for ; Thu, 29 May 1997 20:27:01 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA12250 for ; Thu, 29 May 1997 22:26:22 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from atreides.eng.mindspring.net (atreides.eng.mindspring.net [207.69.183.11]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 30 May 1997 04:35:36 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 31983 invoked by uid 52477); 30 May 1997 02:35:02 -0000 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 29 May 1997 23:51:23 +0200 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.52/XEmacs 20.2 Original-Lines: 17 Original-Xref: altair.xemacs.org dgnus-list:1587 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11197 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11197 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > I think so. I'm leaning towards reintroducing nndraft with nnagent in > mind, but it should be easy enough to make it a general thing. One Yay! > would set `message-post-method' (and so on) to `nndraft-request-post', > which will put it in the nndraft group, and then one posts the > messages for real from that group. Such a scheme should be useful > even when not using the agent. IIRC, the old method let you save the draft via a keystroke from mail-mode (or was it message?). It'd be cool to have this as an option to channeling all posts via such a backend. -Sudish