From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10210 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sudish Joseph Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Checking `Reply-To' Date: 12 Mar 1997 14:56:38 -0500 Sender: sj@atreides.eng.mindspring.net Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150118 23095 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:41:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:41:58 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA04869 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 1997 12:10:48 -0800 Original-Received: from atreides.eng.mindspring.net (atreides.eng.mindspring.net [207.69.183.11]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 12 Mar 1997 20:57:30 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 16338 invoked by uid 52477); 12 Mar 1997 19:56:58 -0000 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Stainless Steel Rat's message of 12 Mar 1997 12:47:43 -0500 Original-Lines: 11 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.25/XEmacs 20.1 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10210 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10210 Stainless Steel Rat writes: SJ> 822bis includes a "SHOULD NOT" regarding the gratuitous use of SJ> Reply-To:. > 822bis is not an accepted Internet mail standards document. It proposes > some good things, but it is not the baseline to which MUAs should adhere. Ah, but that was included just FYI. The problems lie in your interpretation of 822 as is stated in the first two paragraphs. -Sudish