From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9361 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sudish Joseph Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: slow splitting Date: 09 Jan 1997 22:55:02 -0500 Sender: sj@atreides.mindspring.com Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.100) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149398 18002 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:29:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id UAA08893 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 20:04:02 -0800 Original-Received: from atreides.mindspring.com (atreides.mindspring.com [204.180.142.236]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 10 Jan 1997 04:55:09 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 14900 invoked by uid 52477); 10 Jan 1997 03:55:02 -0000 Original-To: The Ding List In-Reply-To: Chris Jones's message of 09 Jan 1997 16:08:15 -0700 Original-Lines: 16 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.79/XEmacs 20.0 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9361 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9361 Chris Jones writes: > Should I turn these hook expressions into full-fledged patches, and > send them in? The reason I'm asking is this: If you're running on a > really fast box (and you have simple splitting rules, which I don't), > those messages could just whiz by you, potentially causing some worry > because the thing's printing messages that you don't get an > opportunity to read. The jwz-enhanced GNUS that was standard with XEmacs until 19.13(12?) had a messaging function that tried not to call 'message if messages occured too close to each other. I do not recollect if it was based on time or print-nth-message, but you might look it up if you have access to that version of GNUS. -Sudish