* is there updated archived-at link in gmane.io
@ 2020-12-20 9:27 William Xu
2020-12-22 17:20 ` Adam Sjøgren
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: William Xu @ 2020-12-20 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
With gnus-summary-toggle-header, the archived-at still shows the link to
the old gmane.org, e.g.,
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/89755>
is there an updated link for gmane.io?
--
William
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: is there updated archived-at link in gmane.io
2020-12-20 9:27 is there updated archived-at link in gmane.io William Xu
@ 2020-12-22 17:20 ` Adam Sjøgren
2020-12-22 18:17 ` Emanuel Berg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Adam Sjøgren @ 2020-12-22 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
William writes:
> is there an updated link for gmane.io?
No, gmane.io is nntp only article-wise.
Best regards,
Adam
--
"Remember, kids! If it runs Emacs, it's a computer. Adam Sjøgren
Otherwise, it's a peripheral." asjo@koldfront.dk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: is there updated archived-at link in gmane.io
2020-12-22 17:20 ` Adam Sjøgren
@ 2020-12-22 18:17 ` Emanuel Berg
2020-12-23 1:38 ` is there updated archived-at link in gmane.io) Byung-Hee HWANG
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Emanuel Berg @ 2020-12-22 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
Adam Sjøgren wrote:
>>> With gnus-summary-toggle-header, the archived-at still
>>> shows the link to the old gmane.org, e.g.,
>>>
>>> Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/89755>
>>>
>>> is there an updated link for gmane.io?
>>
>> is there an updated link for gmane.io?
>
> No, gmane.io is nntp only article-wise.
That's cryptic enough for me ... if someone puts up a web
interface/archive, is it even possible for that to be NNTP?
And what does that mean?
Also ... how about simply removing that header along with the
br0ken URL?
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: is there updated archived-at link in gmane.io)
2020-12-22 18:17 ` Emanuel Berg
@ 2020-12-23 1:38 ` Byung-Hee HWANG
2020-12-23 3:17 ` Emanuel Berg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Byung-Hee HWANG @ 2020-12-23 1:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The Gnus
Emanuel Berg <moasenwood@zoho.eu> writes:
> Adam Sjøgren wrote:
>
>>>> With gnus-summary-toggle-header, the archived-at still
>>>> shows the link to the old gmane.org, e.g.,
>>>>
>>>> Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/89755>
>>>>
>>>> is there an updated link for gmane.io?
>>>
>>> is there an updated link for gmane.io?
>>
>> No, gmane.io is nntp only article-wise.
>
> That's cryptic enough for me ... if someone puts up a web
> interface/archive, is it even possible for that to be NNTP?
> And what does that mean?
>
> Also ... how about simply removing that header along with the
> br0ken URL?
Another story:
Still Lars has to do *recovery* for gmane.org domain, i guess.
Also a few hours ago i did check some whois information:
#+begin_src text
Domain Name: GMANE.ORG
Registry Domain ID: D83725716-LROR
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.namesilo.com
Registrar URL: www.namesilo.com
Updated Date: 2020-02-25T22:22:00Z
Creation Date: 2002-02-17T20:16:13Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2021-02-17T20:16:13Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date:
Registrar: Namesilo, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 1479
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@namesilo.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4805240066
Reseller:
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registrant Organization: See PrivacyGuardian.org
Registrant State/Province: AZ
Registrant Country: US
Name Server: EVA.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM
Name Server: BOB.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form https://www.icann.org/wicf/)
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2020-12-23T01:24:07Z <<<
#+end_src
References:
https://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/2020/02/25/the-fate-of-gmane-org/
Sincerely, Gnus-Gmane fan Byung-Hee
--
^고맙습니다 _布德天下_ 감사합니다_^))//
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: is there updated archived-at link in gmane.io)
2020-12-23 1:38 ` is there updated archived-at link in gmane.io) Byung-Hee HWANG
@ 2020-12-23 3:17 ` Emanuel Berg
2020-12-23 6:45 ` Byung-Hee HWANG
2020-12-23 13:50 ` William Xu
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Emanuel Berg @ 2020-12-23 3:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
> Another story: Still Lars has to do *recovery* for gmane.org
> domain, i guess. Also a few hours ago i did check some whois
> information [...]
I'm not sure what you are saying here but it feels like if
active development is done on Gmane removing that header seems
like a trivial task.
I might be wrong tho and as for me, that header certainly
doesn't bug or annoy me.
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: is there updated archived-at link in gmane.io)
2020-12-23 3:17 ` Emanuel Berg
@ 2020-12-23 6:45 ` Byung-Hee HWANG
2020-12-23 13:50 ` William Xu
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Byung-Hee HWANG @ 2020-12-23 6:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The Gnus
Emanuel Berg <moasenwood@zoho.eu> writes:
> Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
>
>> Another story: Still Lars has to do *recovery* for gmane.org
>> domain, i guess. Also a few hours ago i did check some whois
>> information [...]
>
> I'm not sure what you are saying here but it feels like if
> active development is done on Gmane removing that header seems
> like a trivial task.
>
> I might be wrong tho and as for me, that header certainly
> doesn't bug or annoy me.
Dear Emanul,
It might be my hope for gmane.org, not Lars' thought. Just drop my
before comment quietly. Sorry for the confusion.
Sincerely, Gmane-Gnus fan Byung-Hee
--
^고맙습니다 _布德天下_ 감사합니다_^))//
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: is there updated archived-at link in gmane.io)
2020-12-23 3:17 ` Emanuel Berg
2020-12-23 6:45 ` Byung-Hee HWANG
@ 2020-12-23 13:50 ` William Xu
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: William Xu @ 2020-12-23 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
Emanuel Berg <moasenwood@zoho.eu> writes:
> I might be wrong tho and as for me, that header certainly
> doesn't bug or annoy me.
Usually it doesn't bother me too. Just sometimes for whatever reason, `A
T' or gnus-summary-refer-thread doesn't show all old posts in the
thread, then I used to visit the archived URL to see the full thread.
--
William
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-12-23 13:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-12-20 9:27 is there updated archived-at link in gmane.io William Xu
2020-12-22 17:20 ` Adam Sjøgren
2020-12-22 18:17 ` Emanuel Berg
2020-12-23 1:38 ` is there updated archived-at link in gmane.io) Byung-Hee HWANG
2020-12-23 3:17 ` Emanuel Berg
2020-12-23 6:45 ` Byung-Hee HWANG
2020-12-23 13:50 ` William Xu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).