From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-x22d.google.com (mail-we0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22d]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FC7477AD6 for ; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 08:36:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id u57so6065462wes.18 for ; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 08:36:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=hBcCvzBA9WWB7D9q3N+5pZTCj+LgeORrN6qOkF6Nwik=; b=EJks3kdhmUOUHS9dtDGt/0bHYhtwB61T4UJIn4b9NA53eE5UdG8SgwTndHMXhrzn// +IHBROnmmJYs5hdvSVMpBEbAfOG5AXj1eBpAotohmTZGPFh6voVgsR3GSQSLeA1z2nve E5sadJA3Gqtt73gZysgfgyV4+YwOdk+iRs1Nv5MX9Uyh3cuwHaFdBJWAE7TCE1KiGSek odbhVp3n13s7Bm4rgo5Re2Lfxy8dCrf5BvPuXapqD4Zaf2DSlp3U1fIJvF5y5N/LaN7X J3s+oSe/n8bLnj0mJoqD2o/0VmXfFJ/Azu4hqOW0ej7a2qTLRqnmINl5WKSE7WJq+ztY IboA== X-Received: by 10.194.77.106 with SMTP id r10mr15452wjw.91.1387903003368; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 08:36:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from toaster.adamthompson.me.uk (toaster.adamthompson.me.uk. [2001:8b0:1142:9042::2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jw4sm12800824wjc.20.2013.12.24.08.36.42 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Dec 2013 08:36:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 16:36:40 +0000 From: Adam Thompson To: Chris Brannon Message-ID: <20131224163640.GD18259@toaster.adamthompson.me.uk> References: <20131124111303.eklhad@comcast.net> <874n5yb4h0.fsf@mushroom.PK5001Z> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <874n5yb4h0.fsf@mushroom.PK5001Z> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] even more confused X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 16:36:49 -0000 On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 08:26:03AM -0800, Chris Brannon wrote: > Karl Dahlke writes: > Sorry for all the confusion. I had some spare cycles this morning, and > I wanted to start moving forward. Same here, I've got some time for at least the next couple of weeks, but after then I don't know. > As an aside, in patch 4/4, we should probably use JS_H, rather than > _JS_H. Sorry, that was my fault not looking properly at the way we've been defining these so far. Please change, or I can. Cheers, Adam.